linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJMQK-j5YYqen78Vgng_5jhja-YKSTRut7f7vJ4wWufVfbZy6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jan 2022 01:26:40 +0800
From:   Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To:     Tareque Md Hanif <tarequemd.hanif@...oo.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "i2c: core: support bus regulator controlling in adapter"

hi Tareque,


On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 6:09 PM Tareque Md Hanif
<tarequemd.hanif@...oo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Hsin-Yi,
>
> On 1/12/22 16:58, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
>
> Can you help provide logs if we apply
> 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd but revert
> 8d35a2596164c1c9d34d4656fd42b445cd1e247f?
>
> Issue still exists. journalctl log attached in revert_8d.txt
>
>
> > after apply 5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd
> > 1. delete SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(i2c_suspend_late,
> > i2c_resume_early) and function i2c_suspend_late() and
> > i2c_resume_early().
>
> No issues. journalctl log attached in test1.txt
>
>
> > 2. delete SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(i2c_runtime_suspend, i2c_runtime_resume,
> > NULL) and function i2c_runtime_suspend() and i2c_runtime_resume().
>
> Issue exists. journalctl log attached in test2.txt

Thanks for the testing.
Can you help us test if applying the following patch on top of
5a7b95fb993ec399c8a685552aa6a8fc995c40bd works? Thanks

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
index 9eb4009cb250..6b046012aa08 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int i2c_resume_early(struct device *dev)
        struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
        int err;

-       if (!client)
+       if (!client || dev_pm_skip_resume(dev))
                return 0;

        if (pm_runtime_status_suspended(&client->dev) &&
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int i2c_suspend_late(struct device *dev)
        struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
        int err;

-       if (!client)
+       if (!client || dev_pm_skip_suspend(dev))
                return 0;

        err = pm_generic_suspend_late(&client->dev);