| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 17:18:14 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Di Zhu <zhudi2@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, luzhihao@...wei.com,
rose.chen@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/2] selftests: bpf: test BPF_PROG_QUERY for
progs attached to sockmap
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 1:01 AM Di Zhu <zhudi2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Add test for querying progs attached to sockmap. we use an existing
> libbpf query interface to query prog cnt before and after progs
> attaching to sockmap and check whether the queried prog id is right.
>
> Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <zhudi2@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/test_sockmap_progs_query.c | 24 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_progs_query.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> index 85db0f4cdd95..06923ea44bad 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include "test_sockmap_update.skel.h"
> #include "test_sockmap_invalid_update.skel.h"
> #include "test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach.skel.h"
> +#include "test_sockmap_progs_query.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
>
> #define TCP_REPAIR 19 /* TCP sock is under repair right now */
> @@ -315,6 +316,69 @@ static void test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach(enum bpf_attach_type first,
> test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach__destroy(skel);
> }
>
> +static __u32 query_prog_id(int prog_fd)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> + __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> + int err;
> +
> + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(prog_fd, &info, &info_len);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd") ||
> + !ASSERT_EQ(info_len, sizeof(info), "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd"))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return info.id;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_sockmap_progs_query(enum bpf_attach_type attach_type)
> +{
> + struct test_sockmap_progs_query *skel;
> + int err, map_fd, verdict_fd, duration = 0;
> + __u32 attach_flags = 0;
> + __u32 prog_ids[3] = {};
> + __u32 prog_cnt = 3;
> +
> + skel = test_sockmap_progs_query__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_sockmap_progs_query__open_and_load"))
> + return;
> +
> + map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.sock_map);
> +
> + if (attach_type == BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT)
> + verdict_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_skmsg_verdict);
> + else
> + verdict_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog_skb_verdict);
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_query(map_fd, attach_type, 0 /* query flags */,
> + &attach_flags, prog_ids, &prog_cnt);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_query failed"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(attach_flags, 0, "wrong attach_flags on query"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!ASSERT_EQ(prog_cnt, 0, "wrong program count on query"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_attach(verdict_fd, map_fd, attach_type, 0);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_attach failed"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + prog_cnt = 1;
> + err = bpf_prog_query(map_fd, attach_type, 0 /* query flags */,
> + &attach_flags, prog_ids, &prog_cnt);
> +
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_query failed");
> + ASSERT_EQ(attach_flags, 0, "wrong attach_flags on query");
> + ASSERT_EQ(prog_cnt, 1, "wrong program count on query");
> + ASSERT_EQ(prog_ids[0], query_prog_id(verdict_fd),
> + "wrong prog_ids on query");
See how much easier it is to follow these tests, why didn't you do the
same with err, attach_flags and prog above?
> +
> + bpf_prog_detach2(verdict_fd, map_fd, attach_type);
> +out:
> + test_sockmap_progs_query__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> void test_sockmap_basic(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("sockmap create_update_free"))
> @@ -341,4 +405,10 @@ void test_sockmap_basic(void)
> test_sockmap_skb_verdict_attach(BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT,
> BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT);
> }
> + if (test__start_subtest("sockmap progs query")) {
> + test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT);
> + test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER);
> + test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT);
> + test_sockmap_progs_query(BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT);
Why are these not separate subtests? What's the benefit of bundling
them into one subtest?
> + }
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_progs_query.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_progs_query.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9d58d61c0dee
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_sockmap_progs_query.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP);
> + __uint(max_entries, 1);
> + __type(key, __u32);
> + __type(value, __u64);
> +} sock_map SEC(".maps");
> +
> +SEC("sk_skb")
> +int prog_skb_verdict(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return SK_PASS;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("sk_msg")
> +int prog_skmsg_verdict(struct sk_msg_md *msg)
> +{
> + return SK_PASS;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists