[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b40d1377-51d5-4ba3-ab3f-b40626c229ad@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 20:42:59 +0100
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove a.out support
Hi Borislav!
On 1/15/22 12:37, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:35:53PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 08:21:36PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> I mean that I can rip it out on m68k.
>>>
>>> Who's gonna take care of alpha?
>>
>> I'm sceptical anyone would:
>>
>> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/alpha/
>> Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net> (odd fixer:ALPHA PORT)
>> Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru> (odd fixer:ALPHA PORT)
>>
>> which leaves me. I could give it a try.
>
> Well, on that old thread from 2019 people expressed the wish to be able
> to run a.out binaries on Alpha. Let's see whether that has changed in
> the meantime.
Checking on the message I sent three years ago, it didn't seem that I was opposed
to removing a.out support, but that I would be happy to help test the patches.
I don't have any particular use case for a.out support either.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Powered by blists - more mailing lists