[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220114221930.660B5C36AE9@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:19:28 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, wenst@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: mediatek: support COMMON_CLK_MT8192 module build
Quoting Miles Chen (2022-01-14 00:35:10)
> Hi,
>
> >Have you tried removing the modules? And then reloading them? I also see
>
> Thanks for the comment.
> I did not try it because we do not unload our clk modules.
> After testing I understand that the clock driver does not unregister clks so
> we cannot remove then unload it.
>
> I think I have to add some unregister logic to these drivers.
Yes
>
> >that mtk_clk_simple_probe() doesn't actually unregister anything, it
> >just frees some allocations. Please fix this before making these
> >modules.
>
> You meant that mtk_clk_simple_probe() has no unregister logic in error path?
>
Yes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists