linux-kernel - Re: Exynos850 and ExynosAuto v9 pinctrl wakeup muxed interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e966dfb3-0f90-68fe-f27e-caeda2abf0bd@canonical.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:15:19 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc:     Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Exynos850 and ExynosAuto v9 pinctrl wakeup muxed interrupt

On 15/01/2022 21:38, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 17:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> This would mean that my dts patch removing all interrupts for alive and
>> cmgp was correct:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/66754058-187e-ffd5-71ba-4720101f5d98@canonical.com/T/#mf0b06ebdac554d57d8230dc546c3d57d59d7bd6b
>> Was it?
>>
> 
> Yep. But patches [1,2] I sent recently should be probably applied
> before yours -- they belong together. Please take those in your patch
> series (when sending the next version).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/1/14/861
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/1/3/680
> 
>>> Will send the patch soon -- please add it to the beginning of your
>>> series along with my other patch I already submitted.

DTS and driver changes never go via same tree, so if you say there is
such dependency, then my patch should wait till another release so your
driver change will be in mainline.

What is actually the dependency here between my patch removing incorrect
interrupts and yours:
1. removing EINT for these GPIO banks from pinctrl driver,
2. adding missing GPIO banks?


Best regards,
Krzysztof