lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Jan 2022 18:15:19 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <>
To:     Sam Protsenko <>
Cc:     Chanho Park <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <>,
        Tomasz Figa <>
Subject: Re: Exynos850 and ExynosAuto v9 pinctrl wakeup muxed interrupt

On 15/01/2022 21:38, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 17:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <> wrote:
>> This would mean that my dts patch removing all interrupts for alive and
>> cmgp was correct:
>> Was it?
> Yep. But patches [1,2] I sent recently should be probably applied
> before yours -- they belong together. Please take those in your patch
> series (when sending the next version).
> Thanks!
> [1]
> [2]
>>> Will send the patch soon -- please add it to the beginning of your
>>> series along with my other patch I already submitted.

DTS and driver changes never go via same tree, so if you say there is
such dependency, then my patch should wait till another release so your
driver change will be in mainline.

What is actually the dependency here between my patch removing incorrect
interrupts and yours:
1. removing EINT for these GPIO banks from pinctrl driver,
2. adding missing GPIO banks?

Best regards,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists