[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMhpw7+5Q3MDAFQTr8-sDFgVXOE=v6h8d8pbHiZn8=3h2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:53:48 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Add support for Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) SoC
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 1:23 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > This patch set adds basic support for the Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD)
> > SoC. This SoC contains three clusters of four Cortex-A72 CPUs,
> > as well as several IPs.
>
> I'm not thrilled by their naming. Intel does not produce "Intel
> Fastest in world SoC"
If you say so. :)
> , and this chip is not actually suitable for
> autonomous driving :-(.
And AMD's Infinity Fabric isn't.... infinite. Things have names.
That discussion seems off-topic for this patchset. It references a
marketing name used by the company, and as such it makes sense to be
able to cross-reference:
https://www.tesla.com/support/full-self-driving-computer
Tesla seems to have moved away from the initial "Hardware 3" naming
scheme, so using this naming seems as good as any.
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists