[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220118090058.2c987ec6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:00:58 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nds32 tree with the kbuild tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:38:13 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nds32 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/nds32/Kbuild
>
> between commit:
>
> 8212f8986d31 ("kbuild: use more subdir- for visiting subdirectories while cleaning")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> 37160f01e8ea ("nds32: move core-y in arch/nds32/Makefile to arch/nds32/Kbuild")
>
> from the nds32 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc arch/nds32/Kbuild
> index 4e39f7abdeb6,565b9bc3c9db..000000000000
> --- a/arch/nds32/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/nds32/Kbuild
> @@@ -1,4 -1,4 +1,7 @@@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> + obj-y += kernel/ mm/
> + obj-$(CONFIG_FPU) += math-emu/
> + obj-y += boot/dts/
> +
> +# for cleaning
> +subdir- += boot
I am still getting this conflict (and another on arch/nds32/Kconfig),
and so am wondering when the nds32 tree will be submitted to Linus for
merging? It has not been updated since last September.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists