linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/30] s390/sclp: detect the AISI facility

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:57:48 +0100
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
        vneethv@...ux.ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/30] s390/sclp: detect the AISI facility

On 14/01/2022 21.31, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Detect the Adapter Interruption Suppression Interpretation facility.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h   | 1 +
>   drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c | 1 +
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> index 8c2e142000d4..33b174007848 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ struct sclp_info {
>   	unsigned char has_zpci_lsi : 1;
>   	unsigned char has_aisii : 1;
>   	unsigned char has_aeni : 1;
> +	unsigned char has_aisi : 1;
>   	unsigned int ibc;
>   	unsigned int mtid;
>   	unsigned int mtid_cp;
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> index e9af01b4c97a..c13e55cc4a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ static void __init sclp_early_facilities_detect(void)
>   	sclp.has_kss = !!(sccb->fac98 & 0x01);
>   	sclp.has_aisii = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x40);
>   	sclp.has_aeni = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x20);
> +	sclp.has_aisi = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x10);
>   	sclp.has_zpci_lsi = !!(sccb->fac118 & 0x01);
>   	if (sccb->fac85 & 0x02)
>   		S390_lowcore.machine_flags |= MACHINE_FLAG_ESOP;

Just a matter of taste, but I'd maybe squash patches 1 - 4 into one patch.

  Thomas