linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: tpm: add async space test with noneexisting handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 03:44:59 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@...il.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: tpm: add async space test with
 noneexisting handle

On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 02:43:32PM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 1/16/22 12:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > $ b4 am20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk@...il.com
> > Looking uphttps://lore.kernel.org/r/20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk%40gmail.com
> > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk%40gmail.com/t.mbox.gz
> > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread
> > Will use the latest revision: v4
> > You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> > ---
> >    ✓ [PATCH v4 1/2] tpm: Fix error handling in async work
> >      ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
> >      + Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen<jarkko@...nel.org>  (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
> >    ERROR: missing [2/2]!
> > ---
> > Total patches: 1
> > ---
> > WARNING: Thread incomplete!
> >   Link:https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@gmail.com
> >   Base: applies clean to current tree
> >         git am ./v4_20220115_tstruk_tpm_fix_error_handling_in_async_work.mbx
> > 
> > The patch set is broken. It has patches from two different patch sets.
> > 
> > I saved the 2nd patch from my email client.
> 
> I'm not sure why it doesn't like it. They both are generated with the same
> git format-patch command. If you look at the source, the first one is:
> 
> Message-Id: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@...il.com>
> 
> and the second is:
> 
> Message-Id: <20220116012627.2031-2-tstruk@...il.com>
> 
> and contains:
> 
> In-Reply-To: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@...il.com>
> References: <20220116012627.2031-1-tstruk@...il.com>
> 
> Maybe it doesn't like the fact that the first in v4 and the second in v3?
> Do you need me to do anything else to get that applied?
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Tadeusz

NP, Both are applied now.

BR, Jarkko