linux-kernel - Re: ChipIdea USB regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:26:56 +0000
From:   Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: ChipIdea USB regression

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 09:55:23AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 5:18 AM Charles Keepax
> <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:56:20AM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > So when that patch copies the DT node to the new platform device
> > in ci_hdrc_add_device it copies the compatible stuff as well as
> > the IRQ stuff it was targeting, this presumably causes the kernel
> > to bind a new copy of the driver to that new device, which probes
> > and calls ci_hdrc_add_device again repeating the process until
> > it dies.
> >
> > Kinda looks to me like the best solution might just be to revert
> > the patch, I am not sure I see how that copy of the DT is supposed
> > to work?
> 
> It's not copying the DT, but yes AFAICT it does match and bind the
> child device on the parent driver using the compatible match instead
> of matching on driver name. I think we can use the of_reuse_node flag
> to avoid this in the match, but that needs some more investigation.

Assuming you mean the of_node_reused flag, looks like it already
being set, your code does this:

@@ -864,6 +864,7 @@ struct platform_device *ci_hdrc_add_device(struct device *dev,
	pdev->dev.parent = dev;
	+ device_set_of_node_from_dev(&pdev->dev, dev);

And that function does this:

void device_set_of_node_from_dev(struct device *dev, const struct device *dev2)
{
	of_node_put(dev->of_node);
	dev->of_node = of_node_get(dev2->of_node);
	dev->of_node_reused = true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_set_of_node_from_dev);

I guess maybe that flag doesn't do what it is supposed to for
some reason?

Thanks,
Charles