linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix a deadlock warning in kmem_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:13:04 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: fix a deadlock warning in kmem_cache_destroy

Hi,

On 17/01/22 13:40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> +CC Clark
> 
> On 1/17/22 10:33, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2022-01-17 16:32:46 [+0800], Xin Long wrote:
> >> another issue. From the code analysis, this issue does exist on the
> >> upstream kernel, though I couldn't build an upstream RT kernel for the
> >> testing.
> > 
> > This should also reproduce in v5.16 since the commit in question is
> > there.
> 
> Yeah. I remember we had some issues with the commit during development, but
> I'd hope those were resolved and the commit that's ultimately merged got the
> fixes, see this subthread:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/0b36128c-3e12-77df-85fe-a153a714569b@quicinc.com/
> 
> >> > >         CPU0                        CPU1
> >> > >         ----                        ----
> >> > >   cpus_read_lock()
> >> > >                                    kn->active++
> >> > >                                    cpus_read_lock() [a]
> >> > >   wait until kn->active == 0
> >> > >
> >> > > Although cpu_hotplug_lock is a RWSEM, [a] will not block in there. But as
> >> > > lockdep annotations are added for cpu_hotplug_lock, a deadlock warning
> >> > > would be detected:
> > 
> > The cpu_hotplug_lock is a per-CPU RWSEM. The lock in [a] will block if
> > there is a writer pending.
> > 
> >> > >   ======================================================
> >> > >   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> >> > >   ------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >   dmsetup/1832 is trying to acquire lock:
> >> > >   ffff986f5a0f9f20 (kn->count#144){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_remove+0x1d/0x30
> >> > >
> >> > >   but task is already holding lock:
> >> > >   ffffffffa43817c0 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_destroy+0x2a/0x120
> >> > >
> > 
> > I tried to create & destroy a cryptarget which creates/destroy a cache
> > via bio_put_slab(). Either the callchain is different or something else
> > is but I didn't see a lockdep warning.
> 
> RHEL-8 kernel seems to be 4.18, unless RT uses a newer one. Could be some
> silently relevant backport is missing? How about e.g. 59450bbc12be ("mm,
> slab, slub: stop taking cpu hotplug lock") ?

Hummm, looks like we have backported commit 59450bbc12be in RHEL-8.

Xin Long, would you be able to check if you still see the lockdep splat
with latest upstream RT?

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-5.16.y-rt

Thanks!
Juri