| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2966845.Fhcn9zfbF5@machine>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 15:14:34 +0100
From: Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] capability: Add cap_strings.
Hi.
Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022, 01:39:10 CET Serge E. Hallyn a écrit :
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 02:27:56PM +0100, Francis Laniel wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Le lundi 27 décembre 2021, 23:26:29 CET Casey Schaufler a écrit :
> > > On 12/27/2021 12:54 PM, Francis Laniel wrote:
> > > > This array contains the capability names for the given capabilitiy.
> > > > For example, index CAP_BPF contains "CAP_BPF".
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Francis Laniel <flaniel@...ux.microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > include/uapi/linux/capability.h | 1 +
> > > > kernel/capability.c | 45
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> > > > b/include/uapi/linux/capability.h index 463d1ba2232a..9646654d5111
> > > > 100644
> > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> > > > @@ -428,5 +428,6 @@ struct vfs_ns_cap_data {
> > > >
> > > > #define CAP_TO_INDEX(x) ((x) >> 5) /* 1 << 5 == bits in
> > > > __u32
> > > > */
> > > > #define CAP_TO_MASK(x) (1 << ((x) & 31)) /* mask for indexed
> > > > __u32
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > +extern const char *cap_strings[];
> > > >
> > > > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_CAPABILITY_H */
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/capability.c b/kernel/capability.c
> > > > index 46a361dde042..5a2e71dcd87b 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/capability.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/capability.c
> > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> > > >
> > > > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > > > #include <linux/export.h>
> > > > #include <linux/security.h>
> > > >
> > > > +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> > > >
> > > > #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > > > #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
> > > > #include <linux/user_namespace.h>
> > > >
> > > > @@ -27,6 +28,50 @@
> > > >
> > > > const kernel_cap_t __cap_empty_set = CAP_EMPTY_SET;
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cap_empty_set);
> > > >
> > > > +const char *cap_strings[] = {
> > > > + [CAP_CHOWN] = __stringify_1(CAP_CHOWN),
> > >
> > > I may just be old and slow, but why is this better than
> > >
> > > [CAP_CHOWN] = "CAP_CHOWN",
> >
> > Good catch, thank you for it, I just replaced the __stringify_1() by
> > quotes. I thought of using __stringify_() because at first I thought of
> > adding a new macro which would both define a new capability as well as
> > adding to this array.
> I think you are saying you have a new version of the patch where you do
> what Casey suggests, but I don't see it. Have you sent an updated patch,
> or am I misunderstanding?
Sorry, I forgot to send it as we were thinking on the right place to put the
sysfs with Casey.
I normally have send it two minutes ago.
> > But I think it is better to with this simple way rather than doing
> > complicated stuff.
> >
> > > > + [CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE] = __stringify_1(CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE),
> > > > + [CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH] = __stringify_1(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH),
> > > > + [CAP_FOWNER] = __stringify_1(CAP_FOWNER),
> > > > + [CAP_FSETID] = __stringify_1(CAP_FSETID),
> > > > + [CAP_KILL] = __stringify_1(CAP_KILL),
> > > > + [CAP_SETGID] = __stringify_1(CAP_SETGID),
> > > > + [CAP_SETUID] = __stringify_1(CAP_SETUID),
> > > > + [CAP_SETPCAP] = __stringify_1(CAP_SETPCAP),
> > > > + [CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE] = __stringify_1(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE),
> > > > + [CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE] = __stringify_1(CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE),
> > > > + [CAP_NET_BROADCAST] = __stringify_1(CAP_NET_BROADCAST),
> > > > + [CAP_NET_ADMIN] = __stringify_1(CAP_NET_ADMIN),
> > > > + [CAP_NET_RAW] = __stringify_1(CAP_NET_RAW),
> > > > + [CAP_IPC_LOCK] = __stringify_1(CAP_IPC_LOCK),
> > > > + [CAP_IPC_OWNER] = __stringify_1(CAP_IPC_OWNER),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_MODULE] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_MODULE),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_RAWIO] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_RAWIO),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_CHROOT] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_CHROOT),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_PTRACE] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_PTRACE),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_PACCT] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_PACCT),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_ADMIN] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_ADMIN),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_BOOT] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_BOOT),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_NICE] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_NICE),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_RESOURCE] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_TIME] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_TIME),
> > > > + [CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG),
> > > > + [CAP_MKNOD] = __stringify_1(CAP_MKNOD),
> > > > + [CAP_LEASE] = __stringify_1(CAP_LEASE),
> > > > + [CAP_AUDIT_WRITE] = __stringify_1(CAP_AUDIT_WRITE),
> > > > + [CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL] = __stringify_1(CAP_AUDIT_CONTROL),
> > > > + [CAP_SETFCAP] = __stringify_1(CAP_SETFCAP),
> > > > + [CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE] = __stringify_1(CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE),
> > > > + [CAP_MAC_ADMIN] = __stringify_1(CAP_MAC_ADMIN),
> > > > + [CAP_SYSLOG] = __stringify_1(CAP_SYSLOG),
> > > > + [CAP_WAKE_ALARM] = __stringify_1(CAP_WAKE_ALARM),
> > > > + [CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND] = __stringify_1(CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND),
> > > > + [CAP_AUDIT_READ] = __stringify_1(CAP_AUDIT_READ),
> > > > + [CAP_PERFMON] = __stringify_1(CAP_PERFMON),
> > > > + [CAP_BPF] = __stringify_1(CAP_BPF),
> > > > + [CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE] =
__stringify_1(CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE),
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > int file_caps_enabled = 1;
> > > >
> > > > static int __init file_caps_disable(char *str)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists