[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220117145608.6781-2-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:55:58 -0600
From: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
ardb@...nel.org, nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 01/11] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame()
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
Currently, there is a check for a NULL task in unwind_frame(). It is not
needed since all current consumers pass a non-NULL task.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 0fb58fed54cb..5f5bb35b7b41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ static int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long fp = frame->fp;
struct stack_info info;
- if (!tsk)
- tsk = current;
-
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
return -ENOENT;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists