[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220117154300.2808-1-changbin.du@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:43:00 +0800
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sysrq: do not omit current cpu when showing backtrace of all active CPUs
The backtrace of current CPU also should be printed as it is active. This
change add stack trace for current CPU and print a hint for idle CPU for
the generic workqueue based printing. (x86 already does this)
Now it looks like below:
[ 279.401567] sysrq: Show backtrace of all active CPUs
[ 279.407234] sysrq: CPU5:
[ 279.407505] Call Trace:
[ 279.408789] [<ffffffff8000606c>] dump_backtrace+0x2c/0x3a
[ 279.411698] [<ffffffff800060ac>] show_stack+0x32/0x3e
[ 279.411809] [<ffffffff80542258>] sysrq_handle_showallcpus+0x4c/0xc6
[ 279.411929] [<ffffffff80542f16>] __handle_sysrq+0x106/0x26c
[ 279.412034] [<ffffffff805436a8>] write_sysrq_trigger+0x64/0x74
[ 279.412139] [<ffffffff8029cd48>] proc_reg_write+0x8e/0xe2
[ 279.412252] [<ffffffff8021a8f8>] vfs_write+0x90/0x2be
[ 279.412362] [<ffffffff8021acd2>] ksys_write+0xa6/0xce
[ 279.412467] [<ffffffff8021ad24>] sys_write+0x2a/0x38
[ 279.412689] [<ffffffff80003ff8>] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x2
[ 279.417173] sysrq: CPU6: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417185] sysrq: CPU4: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417187] sysrq: CPU0: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417181] sysrq: CPU7: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417190] sysrq: CPU1: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417193] sysrq: CPU3: backtrace skipped as idling
[ 279.417219] sysrq: CPU2:
[ 279.419179] Call Trace:
[ 279.419440] [<ffffffff8000606c>] dump_backtrace+0x2c/0x3a
[ 279.419782] [<ffffffff800060ac>] show_stack+0x32/0x3e
[ 279.420015] [<ffffffff80542b30>] showacpu+0x5c/0x96
[ 279.420317] [<ffffffff800ba71c>] flush_smp_call_function_queue+0xd6/0x218
[ 279.420569] [<ffffffff800bb438>] generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x14/0x1c
[ 279.420798] [<ffffffff800079ae>] handle_IPI+0xaa/0x13a
[ 279.421024] [<ffffffff804dcb92>] riscv_intc_irq+0x56/0x70
[ 279.421274] [<ffffffff80a05b70>] generic_handle_arch_irq+0x6a/0xfa
[ 279.421518] [<ffffffff80004006>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10
[ 279.421750] [<ffffffff80096492>] rcu_idle_enter+0x16/0x1e
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>
---
drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
index bbfd004449b5..34cfdda4aff5 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c
@@ -232,8 +232,10 @@ static void showacpu(void *dummy)
unsigned long flags;
/* Idle CPUs have no interesting backtrace. */
- if (idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
+ if (idle_cpu(smp_processor_id())) {
+ pr_info("CPU%d: backtrace skipped as idling\n", smp_processor_id());
return;
+ }
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&show_lock, flags);
pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
@@ -260,10 +262,13 @@ static void sysrq_handle_showallcpus(int key)
if (in_hardirq())
regs = get_irq_regs();
- if (regs) {
- pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
+
+ pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id());
+ if (regs)
show_regs(regs);
- }
+ else
+ show_stack(NULL, NULL, KERN_INFO);
+
schedule_work(&sysrq_showallcpus);
}
}
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists