[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220118091615.3ih5n7vhd6tgmnku@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:16:15 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Helge as fbdev maintainer
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:20:43AM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 1/18/22 07:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but text-console emulation/scrolling on DRM is
> >> currently unaccelerated and bound to Truecolour modes only,
> >
> > Yes. Adding support for formats beside argb8888 to the drm fbcon
> > emulation shouldn't be that much of a problem though.
>
> Really? Assuming a graphic card which runs with only 256 colors framebuffer
> is easily supported by DRM, and you can use fbcon without using lots of memcpy()?
Driver: programming a fixed color cube palette, then use RGB332.
fbcon/fbdev emulation: RGB332 support must be added I think. But both
argb888 and rgb565 are supported today, so it should not be hard to find
the places where you have to add some code to handle RGB332 too.
> > Acceleration is harder. The scroll acceleration had issues nobody
> > addressed for years, and on modern hardware it is simply not used, which
> > is probably the reason nobody stepped up fixing things and it ended up
> > being dropped.
>
> The DRM layer doesn't use scroll acceleration.
> More than 30 other existing fbdev drivers use it.
Yes. The world shifted from 2d acceleration to 3d acceleration. Modern
hardware simply has no classic blitter any more. Which is a problem
when it comes to keeping scroll acceleration alive, it is already a very
niche use case and it will only become worse ...
> > Bringing it back is much more work than just reverting the commits removing it.
>
> Reverting those commits have no effect on DRM's usage of fbcon.
> But reverting those commits bring back scroll acceleration for all others.
> I'm trying to find out which patches did apparently fixed such issues
> for the REDRAW case. If you have a pointer it would be helpful.
IIRC the code had a bunch of races and syzkaller flagged problems.
I didn't follow very closely though.
take care,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists