[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdkKYujGZOdGkLK-tzC9q+RjkX59fFZe5cHajGOnDdL2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 11:18:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Axe Yang <axe.yang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Lucas Stach <dev@...xeye.de>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
Yue Hu <huyue2@...ong.com>, Tian Tao <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Yong Mao <yong.mao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v3 3/3] mmc: mediatek: add support for SDIO eint IRQ
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:33 PM Axe Yang <axe.yang@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Add support for eint IRQ when MSDC is used as an SDIO host. This
> feature requires SDIO device support async IRQ function. With this
> feature, SDIO host can be awakened by SDIO card in suspend state,
> without additional pin.
>
> MSDC driver will time-share the SDIO DAT1 pin. During suspend, MSDC
> turn off clock and switch SDIO DAT1 pin to GPIO mode. And during
> resume, switch GPIO function back to DAT1 mode then turn on clock.
>
> Some device tree property should be added or modified in MSDC node
> to support SDIO eint IRQ. Pinctrls named state_dat1 and state_eint
> are mandatory. And cap-sdio-async-irq flag is necessary since this
> feature depends on asynchronous interrupt:
> &mmcX {
> ...
> pinctrl-names = "default", "state_uhs", "state_eint",
> "state_dat1";
> ...
> pinctrl-2 = <&mmc2_pins_eint>;
> pinctrl-3 = <&mmc2_pins_dat1>;
> ...
> cap-sdio-async-irq;
> ...
> };
...
> +static irqreturn_t msdc_sdio_eint_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct msdc_host *host = dev_id;
> + struct mmc_host *mmc = mmc_from_priv(host);
> + unsigned long flags;
Same Q as per v2. Why do you need this?
Yes, you did the first step to the answer, but I want you to go deeper
and tell me why you need the spin_lock_irqsave() variant.
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> + if (likely(host->sdio_irq_cnt > 0)) {
> + disable_irq_nosync(host->eint_irq);
> + disable_irq_wake(host->eint_irq);
> + host->sdio_irq_cnt--;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> +
> + sdio_signal_irq(mmc);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists