[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ea887e9-1fd4-1962-cbaa-92b648b28b53@amsat.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:41:16 +0100
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@...at.org>
To: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, jun.nakajima@...el.com,
david@...hat.com, "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
dave.hansen@...el.com, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
ak@...ux.intel.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
luto@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, susie.li@...el.com,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, john.ji@...el.com,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/13] softmmu/physmem: Add private memory address
space
Hi,
On 11/11/21 15:13, Chao Peng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/exec/address-spaces.h | 2 ++
> softmmu/physmem.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/exec/address-spaces.h b/include/exec/address-spaces.h
> index db8bfa9a92..b3f45001c0 100644
> --- a/include/exec/address-spaces.h
> +++ b/include/exec/address-spaces.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> * until a proper bus interface is available.
> */
> MemoryRegion *get_system_memory(void);
> +MemoryRegion *get_system_private_memory(void);
>
> /* Get the root I/O port region. This interface should only be used
> * temporarily until a proper bus interface is available.
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ MemoryRegion *get_system_memory(void);
> MemoryRegion *get_system_io(void);
>
> extern AddressSpace address_space_memory;
> +extern AddressSpace address_space_private_memory;
> extern AddressSpace address_space_io;
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index f4d6eeaa17..a2d339fd88 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -85,10 +85,13 @@
> RAMList ram_list = { .blocks = QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(ram_list.blocks) };
>
> static MemoryRegion *system_memory;
> +static MemoryRegion *system_private_memory;
> static MemoryRegion *system_io;
>
> AddressSpace address_space_io;
> AddressSpace address_space_memory;
> +AddressSpace address_space_private_memory;
> +
>
> static MemoryRegion io_mem_unassigned;
>
> @@ -2669,6 +2672,11 @@ static void memory_map_init(void)
> memory_region_init(system_memory, NULL, "system", UINT64_MAX);
> address_space_init(&address_space_memory, system_memory, "memory");
>
> + system_private_memory = g_malloc(sizeof(*system_private_memory));
> +
> + memory_region_init(system_private_memory, NULL, "system-private", UINT64_MAX);
> + address_space_init(&address_space_private_memory, system_private_memory, "private-memory");
Since the description is quite scarce, I don't understand why we need to
add this KVM specific "system-private" MR/AS to all machines on all
architectures.
> system_io = g_malloc(sizeof(*system_io));
> memory_region_init_io(system_io, NULL, &unassigned_io_ops, NULL, "io",
> 65536);
(We already want to get ride of the "io" MR/AS which is specific to
x86 or machines).
> @@ -2680,6 +2688,11 @@ MemoryRegion *get_system_memory(void)
> return system_memory;
> }
>
> +MemoryRegion *get_system_private_memory(void)
> +{
> + return system_private_memory;
> +}
> +
> MemoryRegion *get_system_io(void)
> {
> return system_io;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists