[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220118100518.2381118-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:05:18 +0800
From: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpuset: Fix the bug that subpart_cpus updated wrongly in update_cpumask()
subparts_cpus should be limited as a subset of cpus_allowed, but it is
updated wrongly by using cpumask_andnot(). Use cpumask_and() instead to
fix it.
Fixes: ee8dde0cd2ce ("cpuset: Add new v2 cpuset.sched.partition flag")
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index bb3531e7fda7..804ff5738c5f 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -1635,8 +1635,7 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
* Make sure that subparts_cpus is a subset of cpus_allowed.
*/
if (cs->nr_subparts_cpus) {
- cpumask_andnot(cs->subparts_cpus, cs->subparts_cpus,
- cs->cpus_allowed);
+ cpumask_and(cs->subparts_cpus, cs->subparts_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed);
cs->nr_subparts_cpus = cpumask_weight(cs->subparts_cpus);
}
spin_unlock_irq(&callback_lock);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists