linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: avoid warning on s390 in mark_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <073cdc28-6dbb-a2d1-ee1b-f3b53d5b7c81@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:44:10 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:     butterflyhuangxx@...il.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: avoid warning on s390 in mark_page_dirty

On 1/18/22 09:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
>>> Paolo, are you going to pick this for next for the time being?
>>>
>>
>> Yep, done now.
>>
>> Paolo
> 
> Thanks. I just realized that Davids patch meanwhile landed in Linus 
> tree. So better
> take this via master and not next.

Yeah, I understood what you meant. :)  In fact, "master" right now is 
still on 5.16 (for patches that are destined to stable, but have 
conflicts merge window changes; those are pushed to master and merged 
from there into next).  There will be another pull request this week and 
it will have this patch.

> Maybe also add
> Fixes: 2efd61a608b0 ("KVM: Warn if mark_page_dirty() is called without 
> an active vCPU")
> in case the patch is picked for stable

Ok, will do.

Paolo