linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/11] cachefiles: Trace active-mark failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:54:06 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     linux-cachefs@...hat.com
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] cachefiles: Trace active-mark failure

Add a tracepoint to log failure to apply an active mark to a file in
addition to tracing successfully setting and unsetting the mark.

Also include the backing file inode number in the message logged to dmesg.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com
---

 fs/cachefiles/namei.c             |    4 +++-
 include/trace/events/cachefiles.h |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
index 52c9f0864a87..f256c8aff7bb 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/namei.c
@@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ static bool __cachefiles_mark_inode_in_use(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 		trace_cachefiles_mark_active(object, inode);
 		can_use = true;
 	} else {
-		pr_notice("cachefiles: Inode already in use: %pd\n", dentry);
+		trace_cachefiles_mark_failed(object, inode);
+		pr_notice("cachefiles: Inode already in use: %pd (B=%lx)\n",
+			  dentry, inode->i_ino);
 	}
 
 	return can_use;
diff --git a/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h b/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
index 093c4acb7a3a..c6f5aa74db89 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
@@ -573,6 +573,27 @@ TRACE_EVENT(cachefiles_mark_active,
 		      __entry->obj, __entry->inode)
 	    );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(cachefiles_mark_failed,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct cachefiles_object *obj,
+		     struct inode *inode),
+
+	    TP_ARGS(obj, inode),
+
+	    /* Note that obj may be NULL */
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		    __field(unsigned int,		obj		)
+		    __field(ino_t,			inode		)
+			     ),
+
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+		    __entry->obj	= obj ? obj->debug_id : 0;
+		    __entry->inode	= inode->i_ino;
+			   ),
+
+	    TP_printk("o=%08x B=%lx",
+		      __entry->obj, __entry->inode)
+	    );
+
 TRACE_EVENT(cachefiles_mark_inactive,
 	    TP_PROTO(struct cachefiles_object *obj,
 		     struct inode *inode),