[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YebIiN6Ftq2aPtyF@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:02:48 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
tony.luck@...el.com, marcorr@...gle.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 29/40] x86/compressed/64: add support for SEV-SNP
CPUID table in #VC handlers
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:35:21PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> Unfortunately, in sev_enable(), between the point where snp_init() is
> called, and sev_status is actually set, there are a number of cpuid
> intructions which will make use of do_vc_no_ghcb() prior to sev_status
> being set (and it needs to happen in that order to set sev_status
> appropriately). After that point, snp_cpuid_active() would no longer be
> necessary, but during that span some indicator is needed in case this
> is just an SEV-ES guest trigger cpuid #VCs.
You mean testing what snp_cpuid_info_create() set up is not enough?
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
index 7bc7e297f88c..17cfe804bad3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
@@ -523,7 +523,9 @@ static int snp_cpuid_postprocess(u32 func, u32 subfunc, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,
static int snp_cpuid(u32 func, u32 subfunc, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx, u32 *ecx,
u32 *edx)
{
- if (!snp_cpuid_active())
+ const struct snp_cpuid_info *c = snp_cpuid_info_get_ptr();
+
+ if (!c->count)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
if (!snp_cpuid_find_validated_func(func, subfunc, eax, ebx, ecx, edx)) {
---
Btw, all those
/* SEV-SNP CPUID table should be set up now. */
if (!snp_cpuid_active())
sev_es_terminate(1, GHCB_TERM_CPUID);
after snp_cpuid_info_create() has returned are useless either. If that
function returns, you know you're good to go wrt SNP.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists