[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77e8d214-372b-3f0e-7b4e-5c2d23a4199c@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:15:51 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com, alexandru.elisei@....com,
anup.patel@....com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, atish.patra@....com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, bp@...en8.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
david@...hat.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, frederic@...nel.org,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
james.morse@....com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, maz@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, nsaenzju@...hat.com, palmer@...belt.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
seanjc@...gle.com, suzuki.poulose@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kvm: fix latent guest entry/exit bugs
Am 18.01.22 um 14:12 schrieb Mark Rutland:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 01:42:26PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 18.01.22 um 13:02 schrieb Mark Rutland:
>>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 06:45:36PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> On 1/14/22 16:19, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>>>> I also think there is another issue here. When an IRQ is taken from SIE, will
>>>>> user_mode(regs) always be false, or could it be true if the guest userspace is
>>>>> running? If it can be true I think tha context tracking checks can complain,
>>>>> and it*might* be possible to trigger a panic().
>>>>
>>>> I think that it would be false, because the guest PSW is in the SIE block
>>>> and switched on SIE entry and exit, but I might be incorrect.
>>>
>>> Ah; that's the crux of my confusion: I had thought the guest PSW would
>>> be placed in the regular lowcore *_old_psw slots. From looking at the
>>> entry asm it looks like the host PSW (around the invocation of SIE) is
>>> stored there, since that's what the OUTSIDE + SIEEXIT handling is
>>> checking for.
>>>
>>> Assuming that's correct, I agree this problem doesn't exist, and there's
>>> only the common RCU/tracing/lockdep management to fix.
>>
>> Will you provide an s390 patch in your next iteration or shall we then do
>> one as soon as there is a v2? We also need to look into vsie.c where we
>> also call sie64a
>
> I'm having a go at that now; my plan is to try to have an s390 patch as
> part of v2 in the next day or so.
>
> Now that I have a rough idea of how SIE and exception handling works on
> s390, I think the structural changes to kvm-s390.c:__vcpu_run() and
> vsie.c:do_vsie_run() are fairly simple.
>
> The only open bit is exactly how/where to identify when the interrupt
> entry code needs to wake RCU. I can add a per-cpu variable or thread
> flag to indicate that we're inside that EQS, or or I could move the irq
> enable/disable into the sie64a asm and identify that as with the OUTSIDE
> macro in the entry asm.
What exactly would the low-level interrupt handler need to do?
CC Sven, Heiko for the entry.S changes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists