[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <U2VW5R.K2NKZT1MORH03@ixit.cz>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:01:42 +0100
From:   David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        ~okias/devicetree@...ts.sr.ht, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: misc: fastrpc convert bindings to yaml
Should I pick different approach or keeping additionalProperties: true 
is suitable solution in this situation?
Thanks
David Heidelberg
On Sun, Dec 12 2021 at 13:03:40 +0000, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz> 
wrote:
> Well, since this is a subnode, some nodes are not converted yet and 
> at least know it'll bash about iommus, qcom,glink-channels and 
> qcom,smd-channels. I can change it to false, bit it'll print these 
> additional warnings, until other binding don't get converted.
> 
> David
> 
> 
>>  +    required:
>>  +      - compatible
>>  +      - reg
>>  +
>>  +    additionalProperties: true
> 
> Why? What other properties are present.
> 
>>  +
>>  +required:
>>  +  - compatible
>>  +  - label
>>  +  - '#address-cells'
>>  +  - '#size-cells'
>>  +
>>  +additionalProperties: true
> 
> Why? What other properties are present. This is generally never 
> correct.
> 
> Rob
> 
Powered by blists - more mailing lists