[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <U2VW5R.K2NKZT1MORH03@ixit.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:01:42 +0100
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
~okias/devicetree@...ts.sr.ht, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dt-bindings: misc: fastrpc convert bindings to yaml
Should I pick different approach or keeping additionalProperties: true
is suitable solution in this situation?
Thanks
David Heidelberg
On Sun, Dec 12 2021 at 13:03:40 +0000, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
wrote:
> Well, since this is a subnode, some nodes are not converted yet and
> at least know it'll bash about iommus, qcom,glink-channels and
> qcom,smd-channels. I can change it to false, bit it'll print these
> additional warnings, until other binding don't get converted.
>
> David
>
>
>> + required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> +
>> + additionalProperties: true
>
> Why? What other properties are present.
>
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - label
>> + - '#address-cells'
>> + - '#size-cells'
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: true
>
> Why? What other properties are present. This is generally never
> correct.
>
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists