[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b274c5f-6b68-aed9-117d-f89249e57e18@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:11:47 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jing Liu <jing2.liu@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpufeatures: Move the definition of X86_FEATURE_AMX_*
to the word 18
What tree is this against? I see BF16 and INT8 in some old versions of
Chang's patches, but not current kernels. All I see right now in
tip/master is:
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMX_TILE (18*32+24) /* AMX tile ...
It's still in the wrong spot, but the other two features aren't there.
> We have defined the word 18 for Intel-defined CPU features from CPUID level> 0x00000007:0 (EDX). Let's move the definitions of X86_FEATURE_AMX_* to
the> right entry to prevent misinterpretation. No functional change
intended.
Please, no "we's" in changelogs. Don't say, "let's move". Just say:
"Move..."
The subject could probably also be trimmed a bit. Perhaps:
x86/cpu: Move AMX CPU feature defines to correct word location
Powered by blists - more mailing lists