[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3613681.1642527614@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:40:14 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] vfs, fscache: Add an IS_KERNEL_FILE() macro for the S_KERNEL_FILE flag
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 01:54:54PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Add an IS_KERNEL_FILE() macro to test the S_KERNEL_FILE inode flag as is
> > common practice for the other inode flags[1].
>
> Please fix the flag to have a sensible name first, as the naming of the
> flag and this new helper is utterly wrong as we already discussed.
And I suggested a new name, which you didn't comment on.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists