linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: ignore create mem entry for resource table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220118184710.GF1119324@p14s>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 11:47:10 -0700
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: ignore create mem entry for
 resource table

On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:33:28AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>

The "ignore" in the title should have a capital 'I'.

> resource table will not be used for memory allocation, no need to create

s/resource/Resource

> rproc mem entry.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 75fde16f80a4..7b2578177ea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
>  		if (!strcmp(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer"))
>  			continue;
>  
> +		if (!strncmp(it.node->name, "rsc-table", strlen("rsc-table")))
> +			continue;
> +

This is a bug fix that should be in a separate patch with a "Fixes:" tag.

>  		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
>  		if (!rmem) {
>  			dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>