linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFT v2 1/8] media: hantro: jpeg: Relax register writes before write starting hardware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yecq111pZDP9XFNO@eze-laptop>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:02:15 -0300
From:   Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v2 1/8] media: hantro: jpeg: Relax register writes
 before write starting hardware

Hi Chen-Yu,

The series looks good, thanks for picking up this task.

Just a one comment.

On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 05:34:48PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> In the earlier submissions of the Hantro/Rockchip JPEG encoder driver, a
> wmb() was inserted before the final register write that starts the
> encoder. In v11, it was removed and the second-to-last register write
> was changed to a non-relaxed write, which has an implicit wmb() [1].
> The rockchip_vpu2 (then rk3399_vpu) variant is even weirder as there
> is another writel_relaxed() following the non-relaxed one.
> 
> Turns out only the last writel() needs to be non-relaxed. Device I/O
> mappings already guarantee strict ordering to the same endpoint, and
> the writel() triggering the hardware would force all writes to memory
> to be observed before the writel() to the hardware is observed.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/CAAFQd5ArFG0hU6MgcyLd+_UOP3+T_U-aw2FXv6sE7fGqVCVGqw@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h1_jpeg_enc.c        | 3 +--
>  drivers/staging/media/hantro/rockchip_vpu2_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h1_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h1_jpeg_enc.c
> index 1450013d3685..03db1c3444f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h1_jpeg_enc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h1_jpeg_enc.c
> @@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ int hantro_h1_jpeg_enc_run(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
>  		| H1_REG_AXI_CTRL_INPUT_SWAP32
>  		| H1_REG_AXI_CTRL_OUTPUT_SWAP8
>  		| H1_REG_AXI_CTRL_INPUT_SWAP8;
> -	/* Make sure that all registers are written at this point. */
> -	vepu_write(vpu, reg, H1_REG_AXI_CTRL);
> +	vepu_write_relaxed(vpu, reg, H1_REG_AXI_CTRL);
>  

As far as I can remember, this logic comes from really old Chromium Kernels.
You might be right, and this barrier isn't needed... but then OTOH the comment
is here for a reason, so maybe it is needed (or was needed on some RK3288 SoC revision).

I don't have RK3288 boards near me, but in any case, I'm not sure
we'd be able to test this easily (maybe there are issues that only
trigger under a certain load).

I'd personally avoid this one change, but if you are confident enough with it
that's fine too.

Thanks!
Ezequiel

>  	reg = H1_REG_ENC_CTRL_WIDTH(MB_WIDTH(ctx->src_fmt.width))
>  		| H1_REG_ENC_CTRL_HEIGHT(MB_HEIGHT(ctx->src_fmt.height))
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rockchip_vpu2_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rockchip_vpu2_hw_jpeg_enc.c
> index 4df16f59fb97..b931fc5fa1a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rockchip_vpu2_hw_jpeg_enc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/rockchip_vpu2_hw_jpeg_enc.c
> @@ -152,8 +152,7 @@ int rockchip_vpu2_jpeg_enc_run(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
>  		| VEPU_REG_INPUT_SWAP8
>  		| VEPU_REG_INPUT_SWAP16
>  		| VEPU_REG_INPUT_SWAP32;
> -	/* Make sure that all registers are written at this point. */
> -	vepu_write(vpu, reg, VEPU_REG_DATA_ENDIAN);
> +	vepu_write_relaxed(vpu, reg, VEPU_REG_DATA_ENDIAN);
>  
>  	reg = VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_BURST_LEN(16);
>  	vepu_write_relaxed(vpu, reg, VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL);
> -- 
> 2.34.1.575.g55b058a8bb-goog
>