| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:35:04 -0800
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] kunit: reduce layering in string assertion macros
The current macro chain looks like:
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ => KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION.
KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ => KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION.
<ditto for STR_NE>
After this change:
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ => KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION.
KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ => KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ_MSG => KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION.
<ditto for STR_NE>
All the intermediate macro did was pass in "==" or "!=", so it seems
better to just drop them at the cost of a bit more copy-paste.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
---
include/kunit/test.h | 68 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
index c021945a75e3..d5dc1ef68bfe 100644
--- a/include/kunit/test.h
+++ b/include/kunit/test.h
@@ -1098,30 +1098,6 @@ do { \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
-#define KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- assert_type, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
- assert_type, \
- left, ==, right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
-#define KUNIT_BINARY_STR_NE_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- assert_type, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
- assert_type, \
- left, !=, right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
-
#define KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
assert_type, \
ptr, \
@@ -1371,12 +1347,11 @@ do { \
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
+ KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ left, ==, right, \
+ fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* KUNIT_EXPECT_STRNEQ() - Expects that strings @left and @right are not equal.
@@ -1393,12 +1368,11 @@ do { \
KUNIT_EXPECT_STRNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_STRNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_NE_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
+ KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ left, !=, right, \
+ fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() - Expects that @ptr is not null and not err.
@@ -1648,12 +1622,11 @@ do { \
KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
+ left, ==, right, \
+ fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* KUNIT_ASSERT_STRNEQ() - Expects that strings @left and @right are not equal.
@@ -1670,12 +1643,11 @@ do { \
KUNIT_ASSERT_STRNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_STRNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
- KUNIT_BINARY_STR_NE_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
- left, \
- right, \
- fmt, \
- ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ KUNIT_BINARY_STR_ASSERTION(test, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
+ left, !=, right, \
+ fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL() - Assertion that @ptr is not null and not err.
--
2.34.1.703.g22d0c6ccf7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists