linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: avoid warning on s390 in mark_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14380a1b-669f-8f0f-139b-7c89fabd4276@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 09:44:11 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc:     butterflyhuangxx@...il.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: avoid warning on s390 in mark_page_dirty

On 1/18/22 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 13.01.22 um 13:29 schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
>> Avoid warnings on s390 like
>> [ 1801.980931] CPU: 12 PID: 117600 Comm: kworker/12:0 Tainted: 
>> G            E     
>> 5.17.0-20220113.rc0.git0.32ce2abb03cf.300.fc35.s390x+next #1
>> [ 1801.980938] Workqueue: events irqfd_inject [kvm]
>> [...]
>> [ 1801.981057] Call Trace:
>> [ 1801.981060]  [<000003ff805f0f5c>] mark_page_dirty_in_slot+0xa4/0xb0 
>> [kvm]
>> [ 1801.981083]  [<000003ff8060e9fe>] adapter_indicators_set+0xde/0x268 
>> [kvm]
>> [ 1801.981104]  [<000003ff80613c24>] set_adapter_int+0x64/0xd8 [kvm]
>> [ 1801.981124]  [<000003ff805fb9aa>] kvm_set_irq+0xc2/0x130 [kvm]
>> [ 1801.981144]  [<000003ff805f8d86>] irqfd_inject+0x76/0xa0 [kvm]
>> [ 1801.981164]  [<0000000175e56906>] process_one_work+0x1fe/0x470
>> [ 1801.981173]  [<0000000175e570a4>] worker_thread+0x64/0x498
>> [ 1801.981176]  [<0000000175e5ef2c>] kthread+0x10c/0x110
>> [ 1801.981180]  [<0000000175de73c8>] __ret_from_fork+0x40/0x58
>> [ 1801.981185]  [<000000017698440a>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x40
>>
>> when writing to a guest from an irqfd worker as long as we do not have
>> the dirty ring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index 504158f0e131..1a682d3e106d 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -3163,8 +3163,10 @@ void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   {
>>       struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING
>>       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu) || WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->kvm != kvm))
>>           return;
>> +#endif
>>       if (memslot && kvm_slot_dirty_track_enabled(memslot)) {
>>           unsigned long rel_gfn = gfn - memslot->base_gfn;
> 
> Paolo, are you going to pick this for next for the time being?
> 

Yep, done now.

Paolo