linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] Use CCF to describe the UART baud rate clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:37:00 -0800
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/5] Use CCF to describe the UART baud rate clock

Hello,

Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> writes:

> Using the common Clock code to describe the UART baud rate
> clock makes it easier for the UART driver to be compatible
> with the baud rate requirements of the UART IP on different
> meson chips. Add Meson S4 SoC compatible.

Could you describe how this was tested and on which SoCs?  There seem to
be some changes in this series that might affect previous SoCs.

Thanks,

Kevin