linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: mvebu-uart: document DT bindings for marvell,armada-3700-uart-clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 15:16:54 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Vid <vladimir.vid@...tura.hr>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: mvebu-uart: document DT bindings for marvell,armada-3700-uart-clock

Quoting Pali Rohár (2022-01-15 04:26:18)
> On Saturday 15 January 2022 13:05:09 Marek Behún wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 12:50:18 +0100
> > Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Saturday 15 January 2022 00:02:11 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Pali Rohár (2021-10-15 23:42:10)  
> > > > > 
> > > > > If I was designing this driver and DTS bindings I would have choose
> > > > > something like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > uart@...2000 {  
> > > > 
> > > > Drop the 0x
> > > >   
> > > > >     reg = <0x12000 0x18>, <0x12200 0x30>;
> > > > >     clock-controller {
> > > > >         ...
> > > > >     };  
> > > > 
> > > > Drop this node and put whatever properties are inside into the parent
> > > > node.
> > > >   
> > > > >     serial1 {
> > > > >         ...
> > > > >         status = "disabled";
> > > > >     };
> > > > >     serial2 {
> > > > >         ...
> > > > >         status = "disabled";
> > > > >     };
> > > > > };
> > > > > 
> > > > > Meaning that 0x12000 node would be 3 subnodes and all registers would be
> > > > > defined in top level nodes and would be handled by one driver.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is really how hardware block looks like. But it is not backward
> > > > > compatible...  
> > > > 
> > > > Sounds good to me. I presume we need the serial child nodes so we can
> > > > reference them from the stdout-path?  
> > > 
> > > Yes, exactly, separate nodes for serial1 and serial2 are still required.
> > > 
> > > But dropping clock controller is not possible as for higher baudrates we
> > > need to use and configure uart clock controller. Without it we just get
> > > comparable feature support which is already present in driver.
> > 
> > What Stephen means is making clock controller out of the uart node
> > directly. No need to add separate subnode just for clock controller.
> 
> This is already implemented in v7 patch series. Clock controller is
> already outside of uart nodes.

I mean to combine the uart node and the clock-controller node together

	uart-wrapper {
		reg = <0x12000 0x18>, <0x12200 0x30>;
		#clock-cells ...

		serial1 {
			...
		};

		serial2 {
			...
		};
	};