[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yefb7zO9p1iPF3Jm@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:37:51 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Lei Wang <lewan@...rosoft.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>,
Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/dmc520: Don't print an error for each unconfigured
interrupt line
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:17:52AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> For this specific change, I do NOT think it should be backported at all,
> mostly for the reason that people are still arguing over the whole
> platform_get_*_optional() mess that we currently have. Let's not go and
> backport anything right now to stable trees until we have all of that
> sorted out, as it looks like it all might be changing again. See:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110195449.12448-1-s.shtylyov@omp.ru
> for all of the gory details and the 300+ emails written on the topic so
> far.
It sounds to me I should not even take this patch upstream yet,
considering that's still ongoing...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists