[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVWFJEDwjf-htZ_D1484efmuPnz_L-qhcTeUE-GVpvZXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:47:50 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Claudio Suarez <cssk@...-c.es>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "fbcon: Disable accelerated scrolling"
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:28 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 12:08:39PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 39aead8373b3c20bb5965c024dfb51a94e526151.
> > >
> > > Revert this patch. This patch started to introduce the regression that
> > > all hardware acceleration of more than 35 existing fbdev drivers were
> > > bypassed and thus fbcon console output for those was dramatically slowed
> > > down by factor of 10 and more.
> > >
> > > Reverting this commit has no impact on DRM, since none of the DRM drivers are
> > > tagged with the acceleration flags FBINFO_HWACCEL_COPYAREA,
> > > FBINFO_HWACCEL_FILLRECT or others.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
> > As for "why", I think there was a number of private bugs that were
> > reported in this code, which is why it was removed. I do not think it
> > can be safely added back in without addressing them first. Let me go
> > dig through my email to see if I can find them...
>
> Ah, no, that was just the soft scrollback code I was thinking of, which
So the bugs argument is moot.
> was a different revert and is still gone, thankfully :)
FTR, not everyone else was thankful about that one...
> This one was just removed because Daniel noticed that only 3 drivers
> used this (nouveau, omapdrm, and gma600), so this shouldn't have caused
> any regressions in any other drivers like you are reporting here.
>
> So perhaps this regression is caused by something else?
1. Daniel's patch was not CCed to linux-fbdev,
2. When I discovered the patch, I pointed out that the premise of 3
drivers was not true, and that it affects 32 more fbdev drivers[1] .
The patch was applied regardless.
3. When the patch was suggested for backporting, I pointed out the
same[2].
The patch was backported regardless.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010311116530.379363@ramsan.of.borg/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAMuHMdXRgam2zahPEGcw8+76Xm-0AO-Ci9-YmVa5JpTKVHphRw@mail.gmail.com/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists