[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8070e12c-e4c5-a1eb-b4a8-0f48f55608ef@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 07:23:17 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: serge@...lyn.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
containers@...ts.linux.dev, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com,
roberto.sassu@...wei.com, mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com,
lsturman@...hat.com, puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
jamjoom@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/19] ima: Move measurement list related variables
into ima_namespace
On 1/13/22 15:27, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 12:04 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Move measurement list related variables into the ima_namespace. This way a
>> front-end like SecurityFS can show the measurement list inside an IMA
>> namespace.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 5 +++--
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 6 ++++--
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_init_ima_ns.c | 5 +++++
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 12 +++++++-----
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_queue.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>> 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> index 68d8a8e6fd1d..ee16ce5050c8 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ struct ima_queue_entry {
>> struct list_head later; /* place in ima_measurements list */
>> struct ima_template_entry *entry;
>> };
>> -extern struct list_head ima_measurements; /* list of all measurements */
>>
>> /* Some details preceding the binary serialized measurement list */
>> struct ima_kexec_hdr {
>> @@ -134,6 +133,8 @@ struct ima_namespace {
>> int ima_policy_flag;
>>
>> struct ima_h_table ima_htable;
>> + struct list_head ima_measurements;
>> + unsigned long binary_runtime_size;
> Please add a comment indicating binary_runtime_size is only applicable
> to ns_ima_init.
It looks like this now:
struct list_head ima_measurements;
/* binary_runtime_size is used only by init_ima_ns */
unsigned long binary_runtime_size;
>
>
>> } __randomize_layout;
>> extern struct ima_namespace init_ima_ns;
>
>> @@ -124,12 +119,13 @@ static int ima_add_digest_entry(struct ima_namespace *ns,
>> * entire binary_runtime_measurement list, including the ima_kexec_hdr
>> * structure.
>> */
>> -unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(void)
>> +unsigned long ima_get_binary_runtime_size(struct ima_namespace *ns)
>> {
>> - if (binary_runtime_size >= (ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr)))
>> + if (ns->binary_runtime_size >=
>> + (ULONG_MAX - sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr)))
>> return ULONG_MAX;
>> else
>> - return binary_runtime_size + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr);
>> + return ns->binary_runtime_size + sizeof(struct ima_kexec_hdr);
>> }
>>
> Please update the function description indicating that either carrying
> the measurement list across kexec is limited to ns_ima_init or not
> supported by namespaces.
This is the updated function description:
/*
* Return the amount of memory required for serializing the
* entire binary_runtime_measurement list, including the ima_kexec_hdr
* structure. Carrying the measurement list across kexec is limited
* to init_ima_ns.
*/
>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists