linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 29/30] KVM: s390: introduce CPU feature for zPCI Interpretation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:39:57 +0100
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
        schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, farman@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
        vneethv@...ux.ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
        thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/30] KVM: s390: introduce CPU feature for zPCI
 Interpretation



On 1/14/22 21:31, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP relays whether zPCI interpretive
> execution is possible based on the available hardware facilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 4 ++++
>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 7a6b14874d65..ed06458a871f 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_machine {
>   #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI	11
>   #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF	12
>   #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS	13
> +#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP 14
>   struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_feat {
>   	__u64 feat[16];
>   };
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index b6c32fc3b272..3ed59fe512dd 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
>   	if (test_facility(151)) /* DFLTCC */
>   		__insn32_query(INSN_DFLTCC, kvm_s390_available_subfunc.dfltcc);
>   
> +	if (test_facility(69) && test_facility(70) && test_facility(71) &&
> +	    test_facility(72)) /* zPCI Interpretation */
> +		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ZPCI_INTERP);
> +

Don't we want to start the support of ZPCI interpretation starting with 
Z14 ?

>   	if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP)
>   		allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP);
>   	/*
> 

-- 
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen