linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno() implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220119100635.6c45372b@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jan 2022 10:06:35 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@....com>,
        Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
        Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
        Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@....com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>,
        Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno()
 implementation

On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
> >  	case 3:
> >  		if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO)
> >  			tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s",
> > -					 tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log ==
> > -						      TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
> > +					 yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));  
> 
> This would be better split on two lines.

Really? Yuck!

I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I
still see it as 80. But anyway...

	cond->grant_log ==
	TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES

is not readable at all. Not compared to

	cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES

I say keep it one line!

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

-- Steve

> 
> Then,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>