[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DU0PR04MB94170EA5A17F44FC7F9F124588599@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 02:23:48 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
CC: "bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: ignore create mem entry for
resource table
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: ignore create mem entry for
> resource table
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 11:33:28AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> >
>
> The "ignore" in the title should have a capital 'I'.
Fix in V2
>
> > resource table will not be used for memory allocation, no need to
> > create
>
> s/resource/Resource
Fix in V2.
>
> > rproc mem entry.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 75fde16f80a4..7b2578177ea8
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -423,6 +423,9 @@ static int imx_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> > if (!strcmp(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer"))
> > continue;
> >
> > + if (!strncmp(it.node->name, "rsc-table", strlen("rsc-table")))
> > + continue;
> > +
>
> This is a bug fix that should be in a separate patch with a "Fixes:" tag.
ok.
Thanks,
Peng.
>
> > rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> > if (!rmem) {
> > dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists