[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ilufbt58.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:13:39 +0200
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>
Cc: Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Claudio Suarez <cssk@...-c.es>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "fbcon: Disable accelerated scrolling"
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022, Helge Deller <deller@....de> wrote:
> On 1/19/22 16:42, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> If otoh you get the maintainership first to be able to cram in reverts
>> without discussions, then it's very backwards.
> I'm working on the Linux kernel since at least 23 years and am a maintainer of parts of it.
> I know that and would never push something which is controversal without discussions.
I think the entire MAINTAINERS change was controversial and rushed to
Linus without discussion over a weekend.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists