[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+Eumj5sosSkCCANOVqN8fVUDFaSNtB7+f95o+FAp7w6rM4A=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 18:00:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 17:53, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko
> > <semen.protsenko@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Olof, Arnd,
> > >
> > > Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in
> > > v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me.
> >
> > I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in
> > the soc tree,
> > so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days.
>
> Yep, will be sent up today most likely.
>
> > With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the
> > contents (anything
> > I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended
> > up in the "late" branch.
> >
> > As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen
> > no indication of any problems so far.
>
> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes
> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional
> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the
> late branch gets merged. :)
Actually I have such, but to prepare a pull with them, I would need to
base it on some random Linus' commit, not on v5.17-rc1. Therefore I
wait for v5.17-rc1. Would you prefer different approach?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists