[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96ff907a-4ad2-5b2e-9bcc-09592d65a6df@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:29:28 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
"ALSA Development Mailing List" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Khuong Dinh <khuong@...amperecomputing.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
"Saravanan Sekar" <sravanhome@...il.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Peter Korsgaard <peter@...sgaard.com>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Mun Yew Tham <mun.yew.tham@...el.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"Linux MMC List" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@....com>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@...nel.org>,
Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Brian Norris" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional
On 1/19/22 7:12 PM, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
[...]
>>> So there's still a need for two functions.
>>
>> Or a single function not emitting an error message together with the
>> callers being responsible for calling dev_err().
>>
>> So the options in my preference order (first is best) are:
>>
>> - Remove the printk from platform_get_irq() and remove
>> platform_get_irq_optional();
>
> Strong NAK here:
> - dev_err() in our function saves a lot of (repeatable!) comments;
s/comments/code/.
Actually, I think I can accept the removal of dev_err_probe() in platform_get_irq()
as this is not a common practice anyway (yet? :-))...
> - we've already discussed that it's more optimal to check againt 0 than
Against. :-)
> against -ENXIO in the callers.
And we also aim to be the error code agnostic in the callers...
>> - Rename platform_get_irq_optional() to platform_get_irq_silently()
>
> NAK as well. We'd better off complaining about irq < 0 in this function.
>> - Keep platform_get_irq_optional() as is
>
> NAK, it's suboptimal in the call sites.
s/in/on/.
[...]
>> Best regards
>> Uwe
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists