[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220119204356.vizlstcs6wi6kn4b@ldmartin-desk2>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 12:43:56 -0800
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>,
Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@...vacyrequired.com>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@....com>,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, Raju Rangoju <rajur@...lsio.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Eryk Brol <eryk.brol@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] lib/string_helpers: Consolidate yesno()
implementation
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:06:35AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 11:18:59 +0200
>Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:24:48PM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> > @@ -1354,8 +1345,7 @@ static bool tomoyo_print_condition(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
>> > case 3:
>> > if (cond->grant_log != TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_AUTO)
>> > tomoyo_io_printf(head, " grant_log=%s",
>> > - tomoyo_yesno(cond->grant_log ==
>> > - TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
>> > + yesno(cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES));
>>
>> This would be better split on two lines.
>
>Really? Yuck!
>
>I thought the "max line size" guideline was going to grow to a 100, but I
>still see it as 80. But anyway...
Checking that: docs still say 80, but checkpatch was changed to warn
only on 100. Commit bdc48fa11e46 ("checkpatch/coding-style: deprecate
80-column warning") is clear why the discrepancy.
Lucas De Marchi
>
> cond->grant_log ==
> TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES
>
>is not readable at all. Not compared to
>
> cond->grant_log == TOMOYO_GRANTLOG_YES
>
>I say keep it one line!
>
>Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
>-- Steve
>
>>
>> Then,
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists