[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220120233748.2062559-1-slyich@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:37:48 +0000
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] objtool: check: give big enough buffer for pv_ops
On gcc-12 build fails flagging possible buffer overflow:
check.c: In function 'validate_call':
check.c:2865:58: error: '%d' directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size 9 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
2865 | snprintf(pvname, sizeof(pvname), "pv_ops[%d]", idx);
| ^~
I think it's a valid warning:
static char pvname[16];
int idx;
...
idx = (rel->addend / sizeof(void *));
snprintf(pvname, sizeof(pvname), "pv_ops[%d]", idx);
we have only 7 chars for %d while it could take up to 9.
CC: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@...il.com>
---
Change since v1: added missing S-O-B.
tools/objtool/check.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index c2d2ab9a2861..f5bed94e4558 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -2854,7 +2854,7 @@ static inline bool func_uaccess_safe(struct symbol *func)
static inline const char *call_dest_name(struct instruction *insn)
{
- static char pvname[16];
+ static char pvname[32];
struct reloc *rel;
int idx;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists