lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1965fc315525b8ab26cf9f71f939c24d@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:53:41 +0530
From:   Kathiravan T <kathirav@...eaurora.org>
To:     Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
        Balaji Prakash J <bjagadee@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] usb: dwc3: Calculate REFCLKPER et. al. from
 reference clock

On 2022-01-19 23:44, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Sean,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 18 2022, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> This is a rework of patches 3-5 of [1]. It attempts to correctly 
>> program
>> REFCLKPER and REFCLK_FLADJ based on the reference clock frequency. 
>> Since
>> we no longer need a special property duplicating this configuration,
>> snps,ref-clock-period-ns is deprecated.
>> 
>> Please test this! Patches 3/4 in this series have the effect of
>> programming REFCLKPER and REFCLK_FLADJ on boards which already 
>> configure
>> the "ref" clock. I have build tested, but not much else.
> 
> Tested here on IPQ6010 based system. USB still works. But the with 
> "ref"
> clock at 24MHz, period is calculated as 0x29. Previous
> snps,ref-clock-period-ns value used to be 0x32.
> 
> Is that expected?
> 
> Thanks,
> baruch
> 


Hi Baruch,

Yes, it is 0x29 for IPQ60xx based SoCs. In downstream it was wrongly 
mentioned as 0x32, which was corrected recently.

Thanks,
Kathiravan T.

>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20220114044230.2677283-1-robert.hancock@calian.com/
>> 
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Document clock members
>> - Also program GFLADJ.240MHZDECR
>> - Don't program GFLADJ if the version is < 2.50a
>> - Add snps,ref-clock-frequency-hz property for ACPI
>> 
>> Sean Anderson (7):
>>   dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Deprecate snps,ref-clock-period-ns
>>   usb: dwc3: Get clocks individually
>>   usb: dwc3: Calculate REFCLKPER based on reference clock
>>   usb: dwc3: Program GFLADJ
>>   usb: dwc3: Add snps,ref-clock-frequency-hz property for ACPI
>>   arm64: dts: zynqmp: Move USB clocks to dwc3 node
>>   arm64: dts: ipq6018: Use reference clock to set dwc3 period
>> 
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/snps,dwc3.yaml    |   7 +-
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi         |   3 +-
>>  .../arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-clk-ccf.dtsi |   4 +-
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi        |   4 +-
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c                       | 112 
>> +++++++++++++++---
>>  drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h                       |  17 ++-
>>  6 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ