linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1e285770-ab21-be29-af85-be85b3df5993@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:34:44 +0800
From:   Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@...el.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@...el.com>,
        "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>,
        Robert Hoo <robert.hu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports
 tertiary_exec_control field as well

On 1/20/2022 9:06 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, Zeng Guang wrote:
>> On 1/14/2022 5:03 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Can you provide a sample dump?  It's hard to visualize the output, e.g. I'm worried
>>> this will be overly log and harder to read than putting tertiary controls on their
>>> own line.
>> Sample dump here.
>> *** Control State ***
>>
>>   PinBased=0x000000ff CPUBased=0xb5a26dfa SecondaryExec=0x061037eb
>> TertiaryExec=0x0000000000000010
> That's quite the line.  What if we reorganize the code to generate output like:
>
>    CPUBased=0xb5a26dfa SecondaryExec=0x061037eb TertiaryExec=0x0000000000000010
>    PinBased=0x000000ff EntryControls=0000d1ff ExitControls=002befff
>
> That keeps the lines reasonable and IMO is better organization too, e.g. it captures
> the relationship between primary, secondary, and tertiary controls.
Make sense. I'll change it as your suggestion. Thanks.
>>   EntryControls=0000d1ff ExitControls=002befff
>>   ExceptionBitmap=00060042 PFECmask=00000000 PFECmatch=00000000
>>   VMEntry: intr_info=00000000 errcode=00000000 ilen=00000000
>>   VMExit: intr_info=00000000 errcode=00000000 ilen=00000003
>>           reason=00000030 qualification=0000000000000784
>>>>    	pr_err("EntryControls=%08x ExitControls=%08x\n", vmentry_ctl, vmexit_ctl);
>>>>    	pr_err("ExceptionBitmap=%08x PFECmask=%08x PFECmatch=%08x\n",
>>>>    	       vmcs_read32(EXCEPTION_BITMAP),
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.27.0
>>>>