linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: dts: t1040rdb: fix ports names for Seville Ethernet switch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:29:31 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Maxim <bigunclemax@...il.com>, vladimir.oltean@....com
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, benh@...nel.crashing.org, bigunclemax@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, fido_max@...ox.ru,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: dts: t1040rdb: fix ports names for Seville
 Ethernet switch

Maxim <bigunclemax@...il.com> writes:
> From: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>
>
> On board rev A, the network interface labels for the switch ports
> written on the front panel are different than on rev B and later.
>
> This patch fixes network interface names for the switch ports according
> to labels that are written on the front panel of the board rev B.
> They start from ETH3 and end at ETH10.
>
> This patch also introduces a separate device tree for rev A.
> The main device tree is supposed to cover rev B and later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Kiselev <bigunclemax@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040rdb-rev-a.dts | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040rdb.dts       |  8 +++---
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/t1040rdb-rev-a.dts

I applied this but it generated errors, you should have got some reports
from the kernel build robot.

cheers