[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220120090002.hg4jmb7q2s25k64y@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:30:02 +0530
From: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
CC: Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: convert to dtschema
On 20/01/22 08:36AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/01/2022 08:06, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> > On 19/01/22 08:49PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 19/01/2022 20:31, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/22 11:00AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>> Convert the Samsung SoC (S3C24xx, S3C64xx, S5Pv210, Exynos) SPI
> >>>> controller bindings to DT schema format
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 35 ++++
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi.yaml | 187 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> .../bindings/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml | 1 +
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt | 122 ------------
> >>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> >>>> 5 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi.yaml
> >>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 000000000000..aa5a1f48494b
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> >>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> >>>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>>> +---
> >>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spi/samsung,spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> >>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>>> +
> >>>> +title: Peripheral-specific properties for Samsung S3C/S5P/Exynos SoC SPI controller
> >>>> +
> >>>> +maintainers:
> >>>> + - Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> >>>> +
> >>>> +description:
> >>>> + See spi-peripheral-props.yaml for more info.
> >>>> +
> >>>> +properties:
> >>>> + controller-data:
> >>>> + type: object
> >>>> + additionalProperties: false
> >>>> +
> >>>> + properties:
> >>>> + samsung,spi-feedback-delay:
> >>>> + description: |
> >>>> + The sampling phase shift to be applied on the miso line (to account
> >>>> + for any lag in the miso line). Valid values:
> >>>> + - 0: No phase shift.
> >>>> + - 1: 90 degree phase shift sampling.
> >>>> + - 2: 180 degree phase shift sampling.
> >>>> + - 3: 270 degree phase shift sampling.
> >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >>>> + enum: [0, 1, 2, 3]
> >>>> +
> >>>> + required:
> >>>> + - samsung,spi-feedback-delay
> >>>
> >>> I am not quite sure if this required would work here. Let's say another
> >>> controller also uses a controller-data node, but it contains a different
> >>> set of properties. Won't this cause an error to be raised for that
> >>> controller since this property is not there?
> >>
> >> The controller-data is Samsung SPI specific (does not exist in any other
> >> binding), so why would controller-data get added to a different controller?
> >
> > It does not as of now, but the name is fairly generic and some
> > controller in the future might use it. I do not think it is a good idea
> > to list required properties in X-peripheral-props.yaml in general since
> > all those will be collected by spi-peripheral-props.yaml and so will
> > apply to _all_ controllers that reference it.
>
> Right, but have in mind this is merely a bindings conversion. These were
> made like this long time ago.
Yes, but the bindings infrastructure is not capable of handling these
required properties as of now. So even if your next patch was _not_
making it optional, I would still say you should drop the "required:".
Even though the property is actually a required one, we currently do not
have the means to express that.
>
> I think we can drop the "required:" entirely with the commit 3/4 which
> makes it optional.
I would prefer you never add it in the first place.
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Texas Instruments Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists