[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeknfRnxaxcVxEjF@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 01:12:29 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/vmalloc: Move draining areas out of caller context
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 03:35:38PM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> +static void drain_vmap_area(struct work_struct *work)
Nit, but I prefer to have a _work postix for workers just to keep
it easy to ready.
> /* After this point, we may free va at any time */
> if (unlikely(nr_lazy > lazy_max_pages()))
> - try_purge_vmap_area_lazy();
> + if (!atomic_xchg(&drain_vmap_area_work_in_progress, 1))
> + schedule_work(&drain_vmap_area_work);
Work items are defined to be single threaded, so I don't think we need
the drain_vmap_area_work_in_progress hack.
>
> /*
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists