[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19c4168f-c65b-fc9a-fe4c-152284e18d30@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:17:55 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DROP][PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix the #GP(0) and #UD conditions for
XSETBV emulation
On 1/20/22 08:48, Like Xu wrote:
>
> In the testcase "executing XSETBV with CR4.XSAVE=0",
>
> - on the VMX, #UD delivery does not require vm-exit;
Not your fault, it would be nicer if the Intel manual told the truth;
it says: "The following instructions cause VM exits when they are
executed in VMX non-root operation: CPUID, GETSEC[1], INVD, and XSETBV."
Footnote [1] says "An execution of GETSEC causes an invalid-opcode
exception (#UD) if CR4.SMXE[Bit 14] = 0", and there is no such footnote
for XSETBV. Nevertheless, when tracing xsave.flat, I see that there's
a #UD vmexit and not an XSETBV vmexit:
qemu-kvm-1637698 [019] 758186.750321: kvm_entry: vcpu 0, rip 0x4028b7
qemu-kvm-1637698 [019] 758186.750322: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason EXCEPTION_NMI rip 0x40048d info1 0x0000000000000000 info2 0x0000000000000000 intr_info 0x80000306 error_code 0x00000000
qemu-kvm-1637698 [019] 758186.750324: kvm_emulate_insn: 0:40048d:0f 01 d1 (prot64)
qemu-kvm-1637698 [019] 758186.750325: kvm_inj_exception: #UD (0x0)
So while my gut feeling that #UD would not cause a vmexit was correct,
technically I was reading the SDM incorrectly.
Jun, can you have this fixed?
Paolo
> - on the SVM, #UD is trapped but goes to the ud_interception() path;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists