[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yek/c2hPGID0neTc@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:54:43 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: st,stm32-rtc: Make each example a
separate entry
Hello Rob,
On 19/01/2022 10:11:53-0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2022 12:25:15 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Each independent example should be a separate entry. This allows for
> > 'interrupts' to have different cell sizes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/st,stm32-rtc.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
>
> Applied, thanks!
Just for the record, I didn't reply but I trust you completely on this
one ;) I'm usually letting you apply dt-bindings only patches, let me
know if you prefer they go through my tree.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists