[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5807426a-70e5-4513-53bf-c98e74daf42f@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:15:22 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ineon.com>,
Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Mark Kettenis <kettenis@...nbsd.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieter-paul.giesberts@...adcom.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@...stytoothpaste.net>,
"open list:TI WILINK WIRELES..." <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER"
<brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com>,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] brcmfmac: pcie: Release firmwares in the
brcmf_pcie_setup error path
20.01.2022 00:31, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:22 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> 19.01.2022 20:49, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
>>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:30 PM Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This avoids leaking memory if brcmf_chip_get_raminfo fails. Note that
>>>> the CLM blob is released in the device remove path.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>
>>>> brcmf_err(bus, "Failed to get RAM info\n");
>>>> + release_firmware(fw);
>>>> + brcmf_fw_nvram_free(nvram);
>>>
>>> Can we first undo the things and only after print a message?
>>
>> Having message first usually is more preferred because at minimum you'll
>> get the message if "undoing the things" crashes, i.e. will be more
>> obvious what happened.
>
> If "undo the things" crashes, I would rather like to see that crash
> report, while serial UART at 9600 will continue flushing the message
> and then hang without any pointers to what the heck happened. Not
> here, but in general, messages are also good to be out of the locks.
The hang is actually a better example. It's the most annoying when there
is a silent hang and no error messages.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists